1.0IFRIShttps://ifris.org/en/rich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="FkcRxqDkyh"><a href="https://ifris.org/en/membre/victor-geneves-2/">Victor Geneves</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://ifris.org/en/membre/victor-geneves-2/embed/#?secret=FkcRxqDkyh" width="600" height="338" title="“Victor Geneves” — IFRIS" data-secret="FkcRxqDkyh" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script> /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); //# sourceURL=https://ifris.org/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js </script> https://ifris.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2014/07/Victor-Geneves2.png14091276Canadian and french courts are no longer strangers to uses of neurosciences and brain imaging as judiciary expertise; both systems and judicial normativities show different thresholds of evidence admissibility. Although national, judicial and international frameworks may be somehow kind of hopeful within the neurolaw context, the bright and dark sides of both french and canadian […]